- FIFA World
Cup Preview -

Tournament Observations: June 26th 2002
The
Semi-Finals
- So
what did Germany do against South Korea that Poland, the USA, Portugal, Italy
and Spain weren't able to?
(1) They didn't go chasing better conditioned athletes all over the pitch. Korea
tried to get the Germans to run with them up and down the field for 90 minutes -
the Germans weren't biting. Germany knew that it didn't matter if the match day
temperature was 90 degrees or 30 below - they weren't going to win a track meet
against the home team. So when Germany wasn't in possession they got men behind
the ball and stayed in the center of the field, never letting the Koreans
stretch them on the flanks. A lot of pundits observed that Korea never took
advantage of Germany on the wings. That's because Germany was willing to concede
the wings when not in possession. More importantly, though, by closing down the
middle of their end of the field, Germany took advantage of the fact that Korea
did not have a true creative midfielder, so organizing a back-line that
dispossessed Korea every time they came into the German penalty area was
astoundingly routine.
(2) While conceding the wings on defense Germany took advantage of Korea's
weaknesses on the flanks on offense. Those long runs on the flanks by Bernt
Schneider and Dietmar Hamann coupled with deft one-touch passing spread the
Korean central defense thin - and it finally mattered when Michael Ballack
scored in the 76th minute. Two teams made the mistake of thinking one goal was
enough against Korea - this time a well-disciplined and organized German defense
made it hold up.
- By
far the best player on the pitch in the Brazil-Turkey semi-final was Turkey's
goalkeeper, Rustu. Turkey's did a creditable job defensively throughout the
match but on those occasions when even Turkey's tight marking, organization and
dispossessing gave way to truly inspirational ball skills by Brazil, Rustu was
there to stop shots by Ronaldo and Rivaldo at impossible angles. One by Ronaldo
finally got through. A little more organization and creativity by Turkey could
have gotten at least one goal, but Turkey clearly spent more time concentrating
on tough body-checking and physical presence on Brazil than on any creative
offense -- and it showed. Clearly a winnable game for Turkey had they had just
some semblance of a concerted attack against a Brazilian back-line that
continues to not want to take people on physically but is very well organized.
Turkey's offensive strategy -- or lack thereof -- is all the more puzzling when
you consider that Brazilian goalkeeper Marcos is really not all that good (why
Dida is not the first choice is beyond me). Marcos has been the beneficiary of
an awful lot of random luck. He hasn't had to make any stellar or strenuous
saves on his own, he hasn't had to take on a breakaway striker one-on-one, and
he has had an unbelievably fast back-line protecting him and his goal throughout
the tournament. Even without Michael Ballack in the final Germany, with their
deft one-touch passing on counter-attacks and very tall forward players, will
have no problem testing Marcos. Marcos notwithstanding, this is a much better
Brazil side than the team they fielded four years ago in France '98, and Ronaldo
looks like he is on a mission to bury what happened four years ago.
- As for the final between Germany and Brazil, I would be much more inclined to go with Germany and their organized and disciplined defense had Michael Ballack been available. But since he isn't, Germany do not have anybody left who can truly create in the midfield, and Brazil is much more able to handle Germany's fast wingers than anybody Germany has played up to now. Don't be surprised if this is a truly defensive match, with the winner being decided in extra time.
| email your comments |